01.17
In YA Fiction | Tags: Almost Perfect, Homophobia, LGBTQ, Misogyny, Transphobia, YA Fiction
Last week, the Stonewall Children’s and Young Adult Literature Award was given to a book I’ve long found painful and disappointing: Brian Katcher’s Almost Perfect.
It seems this book is receiving attention because it is one of very few young adult novels in which a major character is transgender, and because it is perceived to “promote acceptance” of transgender people. (More on the deeply insufficient project of “promoting acceptance” in a moment.)
This post comes with a few caveats:
SPOILER ALERT: I am going to reveal major plot elements of Almost Perfect.
TRIGGER WARNING: This post discusses a book that repeatedly objectifies trans women’s bodies and disputes the realness of trans people’s genders. It also portrays transphobic violence. I will be quoting passages from the book here.
PREREQUISITES: This post is not Trans 101. If you find yourself asking questions like “what is cisgender?” or “but aren’t all trans people really ____?” I suggest doing some reading. There’s a pretty nifty and subversive Trans 101 here and a nice set of Trans 101 posts linked from Questioning Transphobia‘s sidebar (scroll down). If you’re up for more extensive reading, I highly recommend Julia Serano’s book Whipping Girl: A Transsexual Woman on Sexism and the Scapegoating of Femininity.
COMMENTS: I’m not currently moderating comments—the conversations we’ve had about street lit on this blog have been largely respectful and productive—but I will be keeping an eye on this post and reserve the right to change my approach if necessary. [UPDATE: I am moderating comments as of 2/15/11.]
Still here? Okay. So Almost Perfect is narrated by Logan Witherspoon, a cisgender, straight boy in a small town in Missouri. Logan is angsting over a breakup when a new girl comes to town, Sage Hendricks. Logan and Sage grow close; she insists they’re not dating but it seems like maybe they are; they kiss; Sage reveals that she’s trans; and Logan freaks out. For the rest of the book, there is tension between Logan’s desire for Sage and his horror/disgust/fear about dating a girl who is trans: they fight; they make up; they flirt; he freaks out again; they have sex; he dumps her; she tells him off. Then she gets attacked; he takes her to the hospital; they part ways; she is cold to him; they go to separate colleges; and she writes a goodbye letter forgiving him for everything.
Sage is in many ways an appealing character: she’s sharp-witted, brave, funny, and often refreshingly assertive. She neither embodies stereotypes about trans women nor ostentatiously defies them; she is very much her own person and very likeable in her own right. It is easy to see why Logan is drawn to her. I suspect much of the positive reaction to the book is because readers like Sage as a character. And many readers believe the book has a “message of acceptance” because Sage is a round and likeable character, and because Logan ends up (kind of) regretting how he treated her.
It is worth mentioning that Almost Perfect is one of only a handful of YA books with major trans characters. Two problem novels came out in the mid 2000s, Luna and Parrotfish. Last year, there was Catherine Ryan Hyde’s Jumpstart the World, which also portrays a trans character through the eyes of an anxious cisgender narrator (and apparently draws on the story of Leslie Feinberg, who had cut off family ties with Hyde, without Feinberg’s consent—Hyde has responded to Feinberg’s comments here), and this year comes Cris Beam’s much more thoughtful and respectful I am J, told from the point of view of a trans boy in New York. (All of these books, as far as I know, are written by cisgender authors.) Because of the small number of representations of transgender characters in YA literature, each representation takes on a proportionally large weight, which is one reason I find the shortcomings of Almost Perfect particularly heartbreaking.
Here are some basic truths: We all, including trans people, deserve to have our genders recognized as real and treated with respect. We all, including trans people, have a right not to have our bodies scrutinized. We all, including trans people, deserve friends, family, and, if we so choose, partners who respect our whole selves and treat us, including our bodies, with care and compassion.
Almost Perfect may carry a “message of acceptance,” but it falls far short of supporting those truths.
I said I wasn’t going to do Trans 101, but here’s a very brief review. A trans girl? Is really a girl. Really. If you’re a boy? And you like a girl? That doesn’t make you gay. Really. Even if she’s trans.
Why do I say this here? Because Katcher, never, not once, says it in Almost Perfect. When Logan freaks out, it is all about Sage being “a boy.”
“Sage is a guy. A boy. a MAN.” (p.100)
“I’d made out with a boy” (p.101)
“…by the way, I’m really a boy.” (p.122)
In particular, Logan is constantly worried that his attraction to Sage makes him gay. Not only does the narrative never problematize Logan’s homophobia, but it never spells out its obvious refutation.
The narrative never insists that Sage is a girl, perhaps because Katcher himself doesn’t believe it. At his most contemplative, Logan convinces himself to take Sage back into his life, musing,
“This was not a guy. Not a girl, maybe, but certainly not a guy” (p.150).
Furthermore, the narrator keeps making reference to Sage’s “real sex” (and sometimes “real gender”), as if to undermine her femaleness. When in fact—and here’s some more Trans 101—our real sex, and our real gender, is the one we present to the world, the one we understand and experience ourselves to be (though sometimes those are different from each other and sometimes they change—this is the simplified version)—yes, even if we’re trans.
It will perhaps be argued that it is unrealistic to expect either of these characters to believe these truths. Logan is the product of a small town where traditional gender roles and homophobia are the norm; he has only even heard of people being trans on talk shows. And Sage is an eighteen year-old trans girl who is lonely and frustrated, whose father is ashamed of her, and who has understandably low expectations of those around her. And I agree—for Logan to easily transcend his upbringing would ring false. And for Sage’s part, she is isolated and has very little support; her willingness to accept friendship and affection even from someone who has rejected and insulted her, and not to stand up for herself entirely (though she does at one or two points) is only too believable.
But as a reader and a writer myself, I know there is more than one way to express a viewpoint within fiction. The same narrator who interjects ominous foreshadowing
“Maybe I should ask someone out. Find a girl, and if things didn’t work out, at least I’d tried. What was the worst that could happen?
I would find that out very shortly. (p.23)”
could just as easily provide a framework for understanding Logan’s anxieties. Or how about the time Sage prints out “some information about transgendered people” from the internet for Logan? Rather than reject the information, perhaps Logan could have taken a look and let a few key points inform his understanding. This technique could be a bit didactic (though I think Katcher is a skilled enough writer to have handled it smoothly), but the alternative is to let Logan’s anxieties about Sage’s gender and her body rule the narrative.
Logan’s anxiety about Sage’s body does, in fact, rule the narrative. And yes, I can believe that a boy like Logan would be obsessed with Sage’s body. But I also believe that making that obsession Sage’s problem is completely inappropriate, and aside from one or two admonitions not to stare, nothing in the narrative supports Sage’s right to privacy with regard to her body.
Predictably, Logan is obsessed with Sage’s genitals from the moment he finds out she is trans.
“Now, my mental image of her filled me with horror. Big, hairy balls. An eight-inch cock. Flat, hairy chest and hairy back” (p.100).
“The idea that I’d actually tell anyone that the girl I liked had a penis struck me as perverse.” (p.104)
And after they have sex,
“Sage had kept her shorts on. but if she ever got careless one day and I actually saw it[....] It would turn me off so much that I’d never be close to her again” (p.254).
Barely if ever does the narrative challenge Logan’s constant focus on Sage’s genitals, or the idea that a penis always essentially signifies maleness, or the disconnection and violence of sleeping with someone whose body one refuses to see as a whole.
Most painful is that Katcher allows Sage to offer no resistance to Logan’s invasive harping. Consider the scene where Sage describes being suicidal as a sixth grader:
“…that night, I locked myself in the bathroom and took out one of Dad’s razors.”
“Christ, Sage, you didn’t try to cut off your wang, did you?” (p.165).
She doesn’t cringe. She doesn’t glare. She just answers the question.
In the end, Almost Perfect lets cis people completely off the hook. Sage is held up as a character to sympathize with, and perhaps to pity, but the narrative never for a second suggests that the way U.S. culture treats gender ought to change. It is enough, the book tells us, for cis people to try to accept trans people. In her final letter to Logan, Sage writes,
“I’m sure you’re beating yourself up, thinking this is all your fault. But sometimes bad things happen, and there’s no blame to be placed. You didn’t always do the right thing, but you always tried” (emphasis in the original, p.353).
But it’s not enough to try to accept trans people. It’s not even enough to succeed. There is nothing virtuous about “accepting” trans people; respecting other people, including trans people, is part of basic human decency. And does “acceptance” even mean respect? Or does it mean, “It’s okay to be trans, as long as you don’t ask me to do hard things like get your pronouns right or refrain from asking invasive questions about your body?”
Maybe the message of Almost Perfect is that Sage (and by extension, all trans people) deserves better than someone like Logan Witherspoon verbally abusing her, jerking her around, abandoning her, and then eventually being sorry for his actions. And maybe that message will bring some reader a few notches closer to respecting the next trans person they encounter.
Is that enough? Is it worthy of an award?
I think not. I think we all deserve better.
15 Responses.
Awesome takedown.
From your description (I haven’t read the book), I get the sense that the ending really highlights the problem with a goal like “acceptance.” Being in a position to “accept” someone means you’re in the privileged position to choose to either grant or deny that “acceptance.” It’s akin to “mercy;” it means nothing without power, and what it promises to the person who grants it is continued access to that power plus the nice feeling that comes from believing you’re virtuous anyway.
Hence, I think, the letter of forgiveness. If the author’s goal is to convince cis people to “accept” trans people, he is promising cis people access to the feeling of being virtuously tolerant without actually questioning the violent hierarchy that places cis people in the position to choose to be “accepting” in the first place.
What would it have cost the author to leave his protagonist unforgiven? How about positing that people with privilege think about their own privilege without promising forgiveness or good feelings or the praise of people they’ve oppressed (ew) as a reward?
I am completely with you! Thanks for writing it up!
(Sorry, posted on wrong page before)
Hm. Lots to think about here.
I’m one of the people that loved Almost Perfect and was quite excited to win an award. Logan is an extremely problematic character – as I said in my review “I don’t believe you should get a cookie just for acting like a decent human being.” However, I found him to be extremely representative of the sort of working class guys I knew growing up – the ones who thought of themselves as progressive but when they actually had to face someone outside of their view of normal they clammed up. It’s not an enlightened attitude, but it’s a prominent one. Would this book still be as problematic for you if it weren’t one of only a handful presenting a trans character to a YA audience?
I have to say, I found the story much more compelling than Jumpstart the World (and I’m about to investigate those links, as I hadn’t heard those accusations before). However, I’m most excited to read I Am J, because it’s about time a trans character got to tell his own story.
Hi Angela,
Thanks for commenting! I think this book’s treatment of its trans character is problematic regardless of what else is out there, but the fact that it is one of such a small number of representations makes it especially distressing. If there were more and better representations of trans characters in YA fiction (preferably written by authors who are themselves trans), I would have more patience for a book that portrays a character behaving as Logan does; I agree that his attitudes toward Sage are not uncommon. HOWEVER. No matter how many representations of trans characters are out there, I have no patience or respect for one that does not hold a character like Logan accountable for his cruel, disrespectful, and at times violent behaviors and attitudes. If the story were told in a way that did hold him accountable (like he wasn’t forgiven at the end), AND if the narrative clearly respected Sage’s gender and her privacy, then maybe. But we’re pretty far from that as it stands.
What an amazing post. This is exactly what I have been wanting to say about the book since I read it. Logan is a problematic character and the way deals with Sage and the reality of her gender is even more problematic. Yes, it may be realistic in some sense but could the writer have done better. Yes. There is no doubt that somehow there could have been some deeper understanding or an epiphany of some sort that led to perhaps just more. I wanted more and just presenting a great trans character is not enough for me. Thank you Megan for articulating all the frustration I felt after reading the novel. It is nice to know I am not alone. I wish we had talked about this over breakfast in San Diego.
You see.. i can understand how you guys all are feeling with the “It’s a boy, a man” But THAT is EXACTLY how most teenage boys would react. I mean.. I fell in love with a trans girl, okay? I didn’t know for the longest time, and when she told me, yeah, I was a little… weirded out. I spent my childhood being sheltered from this and I didn’t know anything about it. She was still her, though. she was born as a girl, she was always like that, and nothing was going to stop her from being herself; not even being trapped in a boys body. BUT! I did react a little… rudely. i hated her for a while, but then I realized who she really was… THAT was who I loved. Same with Logan in the book. I’ve read this book and loved it so much, I read it all in one sitting, then put it down, slept, and picked it back up in the morning to read again. Logan is a very understandable person, though. You see, he’s just saying what he personally feels. Katcher simply did an amazing job to me. YES, they may be his effed up views on these girls and boys, but… honestly, I think that he just REALLY wanted to put us in Logans mind. I felt EVERYTHING he was feeling in the book. I cried when he cried, laughed when he laughed, went numb when Sage wouldn’t speak to him. Did y’all ever think about how REALISTIC Logans thoughts are for a teenage boy? I understand and respect your views, I just wanted to give a new perspective to think about.
An excellent, throught provoking post. I thought Almost Perfect was an excellent book, but it’s very enlightening to hear another view of it.
One area where we may disagree is the character of Logan. I don’t think the narrative lets him off the hook. Logan is ashamed of his failure to support his friend and look beyond his own preconceptions. If the story had been told in third person, it may have provided more overt opportunities to comment on Logan’s issues. As it was, it was very compelling to have the novel written in Logan’s voice and to experience his turmoil. It’s a long, long stretch but in a small way, it reminded me of the way Huck Finn’s attitudes changed as he spent time with Jim on the river.
I completely agree with your thesis that acceptance is an unworthy goal and that everyone deserves respect. However, I don’t think the novel promotes just acceptance but does powerfully explore the idea that prejudice and ignorance not only harms girls like Sage but also affects boys like Logan.
I would also like to read a novel where a trans character is fully respected and treated as her real gender. Almost Perfect isn’t that novel nor do I think it was intended to be. It’s about friendship and ignorance and how our preconceptions can blind us to who people really are.
I really enjoyed your review and look forward to reading more of your posts.
All the best.
Linda
Well said, Megan, and I absolutely love your sentiments regarding acceptance, but I read it a bit differently.
Having experienced the worst in people first-hand (including rejection by my family), I think Logan’s attitude was realistic, and a reflection of how many would feel in that situation. You’re right, it’s not enough to just try for acceptance as a goal, but the sad reality is that trying is more than many people ever accomplish.
Yes, Logan’s not perfect, but he’s not supposed to be. To me, as a very interested reader, the fact that he tries (and feels guilty for his failings) does mean something. It’s a start, and even if it’s not enough, acceptance has to start with a first step – and he’s proven that first step is possible.
I hadn’t thought of this way originally, but I think Linda has a point in that the novel’s as much about the harm that prejudice and ignorance can do to those who practice it, as it is about acceptance. Logan’s guilt is an imporant part of the story and, again, it’s a guilt that many choose not to feel. It’s not enough, but it’s enough to provide a little hope.
Thank you.
Ok I’m late to the pary but I feel a need to comment.
Megan your review is well written and indeed thought provoking but I disagree strongly with you in many ways.
I will admit that Logan’s treatment of Sage is disgraceful in many ways. But it does count for a lot that he is ashamed of his actions.
Secondly the book is written from Logan’s viewpoint. Much of the dialogue takes place in his head. Many people, myself included, go back and forth on issues in their mind.
Logan is troubled by Sage and what his feelings for her imply about him. And yes he is an 18 year old kid from small town America. He is realistically portrayed and I think the turmoil that he feels is dealt with very well.
On the issue of gender you have quoted selectively from the book. The vast majority of the time that Logan refers to Sage, he uses female pronouns. He even makes a point of confronting Sage’s dad over correct pronoun useage.
And perhaps my biggest issue with your reading of the book comes in your treatment of Sage. She is a lonely girl who is willing to accept the very imperfect affection that Logan gives her. But she does finally stand up for herself. After all, she ends the relationship with Logan.
And again I feel that your selective quotation misses the mark of her letter. Allow me to quote
“I deserve someone who loves me the way I am.”
She vows never to see Logan again. And that is the way the book should end.
Wow.
Although it’s been a month now since you posted this, having just seen it, I feel like I have to comment.
I loved Almost Perfect. But there was a nagging feeling throughout. I couldn’t articulate it. But then I read this post, and the comments below.
It’s hard to know exactly how I feel about it now, because I feel like everything that’s been said here is a valid point, even those points that contradict each other. Which I guess just shows that it’s a complicated question, and a complicated book. How to define an author’s responsibility to both be true to the character and get across the messages that are key to the topic, as well as essential to the teen readership? Does the fact that a book is one of only a very small number that present a character fitting into a particular demographic have a different responsibility than an author writing about a character who isn’t a minority, or whose demographic is more commonly represented in fiction?
I don’t know the answers to any of these questions. But, as an author myself, I am going to think damn hard about them.
I tend to fall, generally, on the side of “Be true to the character above all.” If that means the character is a jerk sometimes, well, if that’s realistic, then OK, the character is a jerk sometimes.
But does the author have a responsibility to very clearly articulate the ways in which the character is being a jerk, and show, via skillful writing, how the character *should* be acting, if the character *weren’t* being a jerk?
Again, I don’t know.
I think the Huck Finn analogy Linda made above is a really interesting one. In fact, I think I might need to reread Huck Finn in order to really understand how I feel about these issues, and to learn how to apply these ideas to my own writing. Because of course I want my books to do all these things. I want them to be true to the characters, and I want them to give teen readers some perspective they might not otherwise have, but without preaching to them like I’m an episode of Glee or something.
Anyway, thank you, so much, for raising all of this and making me think.
I’m going to go put ice on my sore-from-thinking-too-much brain now.
I’m going to be honest here, your review irritates me immensely. Yes, this book is not politically correct, it objectifies transgendered peoples’ bodies, Logan is a homophobe, etc. But was the point of this book to write a politically correct account of a boy who loves a girl that the world doesn’t accept, or is it to give us a realistic account? Because I feel like you kind of missed that point. If people haven’t read this book, they’re going to assume from your review that the story was solely meant to inform people about relationships with transgendered people in an objective and emotionless way. Needless to say, that is NOT what Katcher was doing. When all Logan can do is think about Sage’s breasts, or penis, or soft skin, or whatever the heck he’s worried about, that’s NORMAL. He is a small town teenage boy who is dating a transgendered girl. Teenage boys are obsessed with boobs, anyway, so it’s not exactly a huge jump, is it? Overall, I feel like you need to step back and take a look at the purpose of this book.
You know, I agree with you that the purpose of the book is not to foster compassion or respect–or self-respect–for young trans women. I believe the author’s intention is to present Logan’s relationship with Sage as a sort of crucible through which Logan goes on his journey toward normative masculinity and heterosexuality.
But that’s not an intention I can get behind. There are so few affirming portrayals of young trans women in YA literature or really any mainstream media; to have one more where a trans girl is little more than a catalyst for a cisgender character’s growth, and then to have that portrayal win an award, is a disservice and an insult.
Katcher could have told any number of stories about teenage masculinity. When he chose this one, he took on the responsibility of representing a transgender character and sending a message (I believe every story sends a message) about how trans people deserve to be treated. As I’ve said before, I believe he could have stayed true to Logan’s character and sent a very different message. That he sent this message instead is both a disappointment and a betrayal of the transgender teenagers who will pick up this book hoping to see themselves represented in it.
I recently read Almost Perfect, and I did enjoy it. Whilst I havent any trans friends, I have had friends, whom after years of friendship, turned around and told me something about themselves that they’d hidden or only recently come to terms with, and whilst mostly I react with barely a blink(being bisexual, when a friend tells me theyre gay or think they might be, Im pretty easy to come out to, they know Im not gonna judge)I do have an inner monologue thats a bit more complicated. A lot of it revolves around ‘why didnt they tell me before?do i come off as prejudicE?did they think ill hate them?’ and that can affect how I view our friendship, temporarily, but rarely how I view them. everyone would just love to think that they’d react in a different way to Logan. They’d be more compassionate, they’d be kinder, they’d not care. But rarely is that the case. Im a psychologist, I know this. A problem I have with your review is that you are really being little different to Katcher: Katcher is cis writing about a trans-girl yet you are an adult female reviewing a teenage boys reaction.
Boys, especially at that age, especially as a virgin, who wouldnt even have seen a girlfgriend naked, are sex obsessed, and sex organ obsessed. Yes, I was disappointed in him, but Im not from a small town, Im not a boy and I believe wholeheartedly in being who you are, being true to whats inside. And I was raised with that. I never had to struggle to overcome a prejudice or be challenged to look outside my box. Logan is a boy, he’s not even a young man yet. He has very little in the way of emotional support of a mature nature. His sister is away, his mother, whilst loving is rarely there and he is somewhat emotionally distant to her regardling romantic liasons and Tim and Jack are hardly paragons of virtue&compassion. Logan is thrust wildly out of his zone, and left with no support. Sage is the only one he could turn to, and the only one he cant, or at least feels he cant. I dont condemn Logan for that, no matter how much I would want to.
Its so easy to say his reaction in ‘wrong’, to berate him or Katcher for it. I think its a realistic one. Boys dont cope well when they feel threatened, they lash out with fear based responses. His ENTIRE view of himself, his sexuality, everything is ripped away. Ive recently watched a friend struggly with accepting she’s bi. Hating hersel for reacting in fear, worryin about what else shes hiding from herself, worried that when she comments on a womans outfit, is it really the clothes she likes or the oman, and if she thinks its the clothes is she lying to herself?shes probably the strongest person I know, in her late 20s with lots of support and she struggles sometimes, so an 18 year old boy, to whom the taunt ‘that makes you gay!!’ is probably seen as the worst thing to be thought is going to struggle He’s not blameless, Im certainly not suggesting that, but I understand his reaction and Im glad to a degree Katcher went there with it.
Sage is also not blameless. She obviously is desperately in want of friends and company and a ‘normal’ life, one wit a boyfriend. with someone that she can love and be loved but the way she acts is almost an amalgamation of girl cliches that always annoy me in books-she does the ‘go away, come back’ thing time and again. She either needed to lay her own line down, friends and thats it, or she needed to talk with Logan much sooner than she did. Holding Logans hand, putting her feet in his lap for a massage during Bio(and personally I was all WTF with that scene as, seriously, who does that during class?) going for picnics. She knew he was interested, but she continued to give enough to keep him thinking she was interested and then back off again. I hate when girls do that. I understand that obv shes somewhat skittish, wants to have what a teen should, a romance, a first love, adn is conflicted by what that would mean-possible rejection if ‘reveal’ being trans or lying if keep quiet- but it annoyed me that she couldnt even abide by her parents rule of not dating. I wasnt allowed to date in HS, nor were a number of my friends-not religious reasons or super strict parents just that we’d have the rest of our lives to date and right now education was far more important, so it woldnt be that odd that she wasnt dating.
And I’d rather people at very least tried to accept people who are different than not try at all. No its not enough to just try but it is the first step and without it, youll never ge the ending you want. You want people to just be people, to not see colour or race or sex, and thats great. But you seem unwilling to accept that there is a process, that steps are needed to get to that point, you cant just jump there and what the end of the review depicts for me, is just how judgemental of those who even try you are. And thats quite upsetting
“Maybe the message of Almost Perfect is that Sage (and by extension, all trans people) deserves better than someone like Logan Witherspoon verbally abusing her, jerking her around, abandoning her, and then eventually being sorry for his actions. And maybe that message will bring some reader a few notches closer to respecting the next trans person they encounter.
Is that enough? Is it worthy of an award?
I think not. I think we all deserve better.”
Sure we all do, but trans people who have been through experiences like Sage’s know that we aren’t going to be getting it any time soon. In the book, Sage recognizes that as well, and refuses to let herself settle for someone like Logan, who lacks the courage to follow his heart rather than his pride. In other words, she takes a big step forward into maturity while he finds some new tail to chase.
While there are many things in this society that are problematic for trans people, this book is not one of them. Anyone who’s considering getting involved with a straight male should know what to expect, and in that regard the author’s aim was totally on the mark. And speaking from first-hand experience, Sage’s characterization totally authentic as well.